Terror.

[lollardfish]

The British Terror Case.

Essential reading for, well, everyone.

Salient details include:

- There was a serious cash inflow from someone, presumably abroad.
- There was no imminent threat.
- The threat was real, and it's not clear to me whether current security systems would have detected it (i.e. whether the liquid would have left detectable residue).
- These people were radicalized by the war in Iraq, although one cannot say whether or not they might have been radicalized without it.
- They were caught through police work, having been under surveillance for more than a year.

Comments

[bchbum-98.livejournal.com]

I agree about Afghanistan. I just heard a figure - we have spent $310 billion in Iraq thus far since 2002. It seems to me that that amount of money could have been used to build enough wind power to supply 41 million homes. (A 150 megawatt project costs $300 million and supplies 40,000 homes.) I also think that we'll be in Iraq for 10-15 more years, costing enough to equal the cost of building wind power to supply ALL of our current electrical needs. And of course, cheap electricity (assuming the capital expense was already picked up by the feds) would encourage choices such as heat pumps and electric vehicles. Can you imagine the freedom such a decision would have bought us?

[lollardfish.livejournal.com]

The thing is - if we had taken down Saddam Hussein and built a multi-ethnic stable, hell, even semi-stable, democracy in Iraq, I'd be all for it. Not because it'd be good for America, but because it would just be good.

Instead, all those lives and all those dollars to make a place even worse than it was before. It makes me weep.

Or, it makes me go study the Crimean War. Or the Soviets in Afghanistan. Hmmmm. History is tricky.