Terror.

Aug. 28th, 2006 03:33 pm
lollardfish: (Default)
[personal profile] lollardfish
The British Terror Case.

Essential reading for, well, everyone.

Salient details include:

- There was a serious cash inflow from someone, presumably abroad.
- There was no imminent threat.
- The threat was real, and it's not clear to me whether current security systems would have detected it (i.e. whether the liquid would have left detectable residue).
- These people were radicalized by the war in Iraq, although one cannot say whether or not they might have been radicalized without it.
- They were caught through police work, having been under surveillance for more than a year.

Date: 2006-08-29 07:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lollardfish.livejournal.com
Right. The thing is that surveillance is a really key part of police work. I just want it to be legal. The FISA court is a pretty good system in that they approve essentially everything, but the mere fact that one has to go in front of them keeps abuses at bay.

Electonic wiretapping is a credible form of intelligence work - get a warrant!

Date: 2006-08-30 11:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] groomporter.livejournal.com
Here here!

Profile

lollardfish: (Default)
lollardfish

September 2014

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 3rd, 2026 07:15 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios