(no subject)
Dec. 13th, 2005 04:07 pmAny clue who I write to about the Minneapolis smoking ban? I spent money in bars last weekend in a Minneapolis bar /because/ it was smoke-free. Now the Hennepin Cnty Commission has temporarily reduced the ban to only apply to places that sell more food than liquor. Time to complain.
EDIT: After further review, while it seems clear that some bars have been hurt and that the demographic of bar use has changed (where people go, etc.), overall, the hospitality industry has remained pretty stable. So ... I feel bad for bars being hurt. My stance remains.
EDIT: After further review, while it seems clear that some bars have been hurt and that the demographic of bar use has changed (where people go, etc.), overall, the hospitality industry has remained pretty stable. So ... I feel bad for bars being hurt. My stance remains.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 10:10 pm (UTC)Some of us really don't mind the ban being lifted from bars. ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 11:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-14 05:02 pm (UTC)Anyway, what I want to see is what the effects of auto emissions and various other environmental air borne contaminates have in relation to lung cancer (and asthma and other lung issues). Funny, an SUV emits more particulates and carcinogens with one tank of gas than I do in an entire year. But, please, blame the smokers and "2nd hand smoke", not the oil industry. :)
I wish I could post when not at work so as to put together a more coherant paragraph.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-14 10:34 pm (UTC)I totally agree with what you're talking about here. The thing, though, is not to let up on secondhand smoke, which /is/ a health hazard, but to also work on other health hazards that degrade air quality.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 11:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-14 12:45 am (UTC)Which is fine, but a) he's a Hennepin County Commissioner, just what influence does he think he has over at the Leg, and 2) how does recinding the ban in Hennepin County address that?
K.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 10:41 pm (UTC)Therefore, my compromise is a ban on smoking in venues where they serve food, or hold live performances. Bars where the only attraction is drinking would be excluded. (Of course, state-wide, so it evens the competition between cities.)
no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 10:43 pm (UTC)Yeah, I guess that does make me some sort of totalitarian Nazi. Tough. Your right to smoke ends where my nostrils begin.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 11:07 pm (UTC)Someone has to lead. Let it be my city.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 11:17 pm (UTC)I just wish more would follow faster.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 11:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 11:33 pm (UTC)Smokers need to get over it or stay the hell home. But that's just MNSHO.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 11:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 11:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-14 12:57 am (UTC)OK, and I am done violating my rule of not answer questions on LJ that one can google in under 5 minutes.
K. [but I was curious, too]
no subject
Date: 2005-12-14 12:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-14 01:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-14 05:47 am (UTC)And for the record, I also agree with the ban...from a health standpoint as well as from a performance standpoint...Besides, I LIKE coming home from dancing NOT smelling all stinking...
no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 11:03 pm (UTC)Society has a right to restrict nuisance behavior
We have every legal right to listen to (shudder) Slim Witman at 3 a.m...
We have every legal right to watch gory, mad slasher films while eating Thanksgiving dinner...
-but I don't have the right to inflict those activities upon the senses of my neighbors. Our culture is increasingly looking at smoking as a nuisance behavior.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 11:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 11:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-14 12:48 am (UTC)K.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-14 01:02 am (UTC)