(no subject)
Nov. 2nd, 2009 07:30 pmCan anyone more knowledgeable than I point out any examples of the Vilification Tennis show doing productive social satire - that is, making fun of something in order to demonstrate its impropriety or nonsensical nature?
I'm seeing excuses that I shouldn't be offended at their upcoming show because it's productive social satire.
I think it's just an excuse and the show isn't about satire, it's about getting laughs by being as mean as possible. They are really good at it. They get a lot of laughs. I think they're kidding themselves about the satire, but I'm not that familiar with their shows.
I'm seeing excuses that I shouldn't be offended at their upcoming show because it's productive social satire.
I think it's just an excuse and the show isn't about satire, it's about getting laughs by being as mean as possible. They are really good at it. They get a lot of laughs. I think they're kidding themselves about the satire, but I'm not that familiar with their shows.
Re: Vilification Tennis and the art of offensive comedy
Date: 2009-11-03 12:42 pm (UTC)However:
"I have ADHD and have always been wild. When I was a kid the other children called me all sorts of names such as "Spaz" "Mental" "Retard" (That's right! I said it!)and "Loser." I turned out just fine (ok, some might argue that last point)."
That you withstood this kind of thing is not, I think, justification to inflict it on others.
Actually, insult comedy is pretty common. Plenty of people do this type of humor, just not this format. And it's a really good format executed by tremendously skilled people (at least the last time I saw it, and since it's Tim's show, and Tim's sense of comedy is pretty finely honed, I'm sure it's still great). I have at no time questioned the show's ability to produce laughter.